Search Bob Brinker Fan Club Blogs

Showing posts with label David Korn. Show all posts
Showing posts with label David Korn. Show all posts

Monday, March 17, 2014

Bob Brinker GNMA Advice

Moneytalk with Bob Brinker Commentary for March 17, 2014 Radio Show

The following commentary is from my "Retirement Advisor" writing partner,  David Korn

Caller: This caller heard Bob saying recently that he thought GNMA’s would take a hit and that he was no longer recommending them.  The caller said she still owns a large position in GNMAs and wanted to know what Bob would do.  

Bob said his recommendation against owning the GNMA fund is based on a risk/reward decision over a long period of time.  Bob said he is recommending shorter duration fixed income securities as part of an overall diversified bond portfolio.  Bob said the average duration he is recommending is about 1 year.  The GNMA fund duration is typically several years.  Bob said he thinks we will eventually see a normalization of interest rates and when that happens you will see the net asset value of the GNMA degrade and given what they are paying it is not worth the risk.


David Korn: The Vanguard GNMA fund (VFIIX) that Bob recommended for so many years is actually up 2.48% year-to-date, not too shabby at all. It has a current yield of 2.80% and its shares closed Friday at $10.62.
See my article:
Monday, July 15, 2013: Bob Brinker Fan Club:
Sell GNMA to Buy Fidelity Floating Rate Income Fund, Good or Bad Advice? 




FREE==> SAMPLE Issue  <== FREE

More information:

The above commentary is courtesy of my writing partner, David Korn
David Korn's Stock Market Commentary, Interpretation of Moneytalk (Bob Brinker Host), Financial Education, Helpful Links, Guest Editorials, and Special Alert E-Mail Service.  Copyright David Korn, L.L.C. 2012
 If you would like a free sample of David's complete "Brinker related newsletter" and his "Retirement Advisor" newsletter, then click this link to send an email request and please tell us a bit about yourself too.

Tuesday, December 03, 2013

Bob Brinker's Recommendation for Cash

Moneytalk with Bob Brinker Commentary for December 1, 2013 Radio Show
The following commentary is from my "Retirement Advisor" writing partner,  David Korn.
PARKING CASH

Caller: Where can you keep cash where it can be liquid yet have access to it immediately.

Bob said one possibility would be a quality money market fund. You won’t get any kind of meaningful return on that money in this kind of interest rate environment. It is really about safety and having access to the fund. Some money market funds have check writing privileges. For the ultimate safety, you would go to a treasury based money market fund or to one of the big well known blue chip financial money market funds and there you would likely get check writing privileges as well.

EC(David Korn): Bob has long recommended the Vanguard Prime Money Market Fund (VMMXX) for such purposes which allows you to redeem shares by writing a check for $250 or more. Read the prospectus at the following: http://www.vanguard.com/pub/Pdf/p030.pdf

Kirk's Comment:  Money market funds offer terrible returns these days.  Vanguard only pays 0.01%.  There are several FDIC insured savings accounts listed here that pay almost 100 times more or nearly 1.0%.   In every issue of "The Retirement Advisor," David and I update where you can get the best interest rates for cash that is 100% safe, usually with FDIC insurance. 

Currently we have a percentage of our safe portfolios parked in an online savings account, with No Monthly Fees and No Minimum Balance at American Express Bank, Check out that link to get their current rates and more info.

Kirk's Comment:  We don't jump from fund to fund each month for a few tenths of a percent, but if you can certainly do better than 0.01%.  If you have new money looking for a 100% safe parking place, then look at the survey of top savings rates at Savings Account Rate Survey


Best Retirement Newsletter
Read "Kirk's Two Investment Letters - Best Retirement Portfolio For You" to decide which newsletter I offer is best for you.
Commentary is courtesy of my writing partner, David Korn
David Korn's Stock Market Commentary, Interpretation of Moneytalk (Bob Brinker Host), Financial Education, Helpful Links, Guest Editorials, and Special Alert E-Mail Service.  Copyright David Korn, L.L.C. 2013
If you would like a free sample of David's complete "Brinker related newsletter" and his "Retirement Advisor" newsletter, then click this link to send an email request and please tell us a bit about yourself too.


Monday, December 02, 2013

Bob Brinker Moneytalk Monologue & Caller Discussion Summary

Moneytalk with Bob Brinker Commentary for December 1, 2013 Radio Show


The following commentary is from my "Retirement Advisor" writing partner,  David Korn.
GOVERNMENT DEADLINE

Brinker Comment: A December 13th deadline has been established for the House Senate Committee to come together for a new budget agreement. This is what we wound up with after the government shut down was completed in October. The word we are getting is that all they are trying to do is to curb the sequester cuts that are mandated from the last time they failed to reach an agreement. This includes $19 billion that will hit pentagon budgets in January. The lack of leadership in Washington D.C. That seems capable of leading on fiscal issues. What happens if an agreement isn’t reached on December 13th? Nothing really. There is no immediate consequence. There was a budget resolution back in 2009 that sets the spending parameters for the federal government but haven’t had once since that time. What we have had is a lot of partisan fighting. The disagreements we have now are the same as always; some want entitlements cut, others want additional tax revenues.

Can our current situation go on forever? No. We need reform to entitlement spending including Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security because that accounts for almost 50% of our federal government spending. But to do that you have to get past the lobbyists that swarm capital hill and the special interest groups, like the AARP that have 37 million members who don’t want to see changes that would result in any diminution of benefits. That is just one example of a powerful lobbying group and this is one reason you don’t reform.

EC(David Korn): The real important deadline is January 15 when the government funding again expires. Read the article, “Do-Nothing Congress Dithers on Budget as Deadline Nears” at this url: http://tinyurl.com/qhd9p3n

Brinker Comment: Did Bowles-Simpson come up with some good ideas for reform? Yes, but they have basically been ignored. Even Simpson and Bowles failed to address the black hole called Medicare which is unsustainable. The average couple pays in about $130,000 into Medicare while they get back about $350,000 in lifetime benefits. And Social Security as it is constituted is going nowhere as the current workforce pays in a smaller amount to a growing number of beneficiaries. Our country is fooling itself by thinking that the low interest rate environment we are currently in will allow us to continue to borrow at the same pace. Our leaders fail to recall that the average interest rate we have had to pay on our national debt is 5.8%. Even though it is at 2% right now that won’t last forever. A 4% increase in interest rate would cost us $600 billion in interest per year — or $6 trillion over 10 years in interest expense.

Caller:  Shouldn't the government consider indexing benefits to social security to inflation? Bob said the schedule of payouts to social security has an inflation component in it. The rate of return earned by social security has always been pegged to the rate of return on the Treasuries as mandated by law. They don’t have any choice. There was an effort by George W. Bush to put a portion of the social security money into the stock market but that effort was shot down in a big way.

Kirk's Comment:   See Social Security COLA for 2014
  • Notice that the cap on the upper rate is going up far faster than inflation which is a tax increase on those making more than the cap.
  • "For those of us still working, the maximum amount of earnings subject to the Social Security tax (taxable maximum) will increase 2.9% to $117,000 from $113,700."
  • Kirk Lindstrom's Investment Letter
    Don't Miss Out!
    Subscribe Now

    Get December Issue for Free!
Brinker Comment: Bob noted that sequestration is flawed because it cuts everything, the good and the bad and is no way to govern. Instead, we have career politicians who can’t get the job done. Bob said going to the rich isn’t the solution because the top 10% of taxpayers are already carrying the mail for 70% of the personal income tax bill. The political games in Washington go on and on.

EC: The 29-member bipartisan panel faces a December 13th deadline but as Bob noted these panels don’t seem to have much success. There have been over a dozen panels convened since the end of WWII but their recommendations have rarely spurred congressional action.

Caller: What kind of carnage can we expect and when can we expect to see it if our government continues down its present fiscal spending path? Bob said the timeline is difficult to predict, but certainly we are headed to oblivion if we don’t make cuts in Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security in that order of priority. What is the worse kind of outcome? That would be if our national debt continued to explode against a backdrop of higher interest rates which made the interest carrying costs unsustainable. Suppose you had the government bonds downgraded beyond investment grade level, you would have a hard time finding ways to borrow the money without paying an exorbitant interest rates. That would be the worst case of scenario.

Caller: What have you heard about reform in social security, such as a cut-off point in income for social security of they go with means testing? Bob said the discussions haven’t got that far at all. Ironically, social security is the easiest of all the entitlements to fix. The age expectancy has gone way up since the social security program was developed. They could simply extend the age by a month or two down the road when you are able to take benefits. This could be done over a period of many years and it would enable them to greatly expand the viability of the program. This is an easy solution that our government can’t even tackle.

Caller: This caller noted that the US Government has tons of property across the United States. Why not sell some of those assets or lease them out and put the money in a sovereign nation fund and use some of that money to pay off social security. Bob said the votes are not there for that. Not even close to enough votes for that kind of proposal.

Brinker Comment: Bob said the Medicare program is where the money is and that program has the potential to really bankrupt the economy. But we have known it needs to be fixed for years and they haven’t done it. The closest thing we got was Simpson Bowles but even they couldn’t get it done. There is so many powerful forces lobbying against the reform of this it will take real leadership of our government officials to get it done.

Caller: This caller asked Bob why he doesn’t comment on cutting spending in the other half of the budget where, for example, there is extreme wasteful defense spending going on. Bob got a little “defensive” so to speak, and told the caller he must not listen to Moneytalk because Bob has cited with approval the views of Senator Coburn who has said there is 5-10% fat in the defense budget and for that reason, Bob said the sequestration’s cuts in defense spending hasn’t bothered him all that much.

EC: Senator Tom Coburn (R-OK) released an oversight report entitled, “Department of Everything” which outlines how the Department of Defense could save $67.9 billion over ten years by making specific cuts to “non-defense” defense spending — spending that DOD can cut without cutting vital defense priorities. You can read the report at this url: http://tinyurl.com/cavewxa

Best Retirement Newsletter
Read "Kirk's Two Investment Letters - Best Retirement Portfolio For You" to decide which newsletter I offer is best for you.

Commentary is courtesy of my writing partner, David Korn
David Korn's Stock Market Commentary, Interpretation of Moneytalk (Bob Brinker Host), Financial Education, Helpful Links, Guest Editorials, and Special Alert E-Mail Service.  Copyright David Korn, L.L.C. 2013
If you would like a free sample of David's complete "Brinker related newsletter" and his "Retirement Advisor" newsletter, then click this link to send an email request and please tell us a bit about yourself too.
Kirk Lindstrom's Investment Letter
Don't Miss Out!
Subscribe Now

Get December Issue for Free!
==>   My returns by year  &  New Record Highs <==
This table shows my newsletter "Core and Explore Portfolios" from 1998 through the end of Q3

Wednesday, June 26, 2013

Bob Brinker - Market Prediction, Diversification and Inflation

Moneytalk with Bob Brinker Commentary for June 16, 2013 Radio Show


The following commentary is from my "Retirement Advisor" writing partner,  David Korn.

DIVERSIFYING 
Caller: This caller inherited some stock that accounts for 25% of his portfolio. How should he handle that? 
Bob said he would own something like the total stock market index through Vanguard or Fidelity in a low cost index fund. That is a sideways move in the stock market. 
Kirk Comment:  I like this advice.  Depending on how much money the caller has, I would recommend further diversification with some (20% for young people, 50% for retired people) in fixed income so you have money to "rebalance" and buy low when the market has the inevitable correction.  I felt so sad for many Brinker followers who were 100% in equities at the top before the last bear market.  The rode it all the way down and some actually sold out according to some sad emails I get. 
I also like to split the total stock market index fund into its components plus add international diversification once you have enough in your portfolio to get over the minimums. Then when you have enough in this diverse portfolio to have the six index funds I currently recommend in my "Core Portfolios" then you are ready to add explore stocks.  Of course some like to add explore stocks (what Brinker calls "individual issues") sooner, which is fine, but that comes at a price of higher portfolio volatility.  That is fine with me as long as it doesn't scare you out of the portfolios when the markets are down.  One reason my method works is we have targets to buy low at so we welcome market declines.
The caller asked if he should sell the stock now, raise the cash, and then wait for a stock market correction to go into the index fund? 
Bob said he doesn¹t know what the market will do and that is a sideways move and since he recommends being invested right now you do it on the same day. 
Kirk Comment:  I don't think I ever heard Brinker say this before!  Did someone slip a "truth serum" into his iced tea?

EC( David Korn): Bob continues to recommend a fully invested position insofar as the stock market is concerned, a recommendation he has held since May 2003. 



Kirk Comment:  Actually Brinker has recommended being "fully invested" since March 2003.
INFLATION 
Brinker Comment: The Consumer Price Index comes out Tuesday and we have inflation down near record lows. Why is inflation so low? Because the economy is growing slowly and there is so much excess labor out there. When you combine those two things, it is a recipe for low inflation. 
EC: I read a thought provoking article entitled, ³The Truth About Inflation: Prices Don¹t Deceive, the CPI Does² that I found at this url:  http://tinyurl.com/l3rqsad
MONEYTALK GUEST Anita Raghavan 
Bob had on Anita Raghavan, author of the book, "The Billionaire¹s Apprentice: The Rise of the Indian-American Elite and The Fall of the Galleon Hedge Fund." The interview wasn't worth summarizing at all 

Best Retirement Newsletter
Read "Kirk's Two Investment Letters - Best Retirement Portfolio For You" to decide which newsletter I offer is best for you.

Some of the above commentary is courtesy of my writing partner, David Korn
David Korn's Stock Market Commentary, Interpretation of Moneytalk (Bob Brinker Host), Financial Education, Helpful Links, Guest Editorials, and Special Alert E-Mail Service.  Copyright David Korn, L.L.C. 2013
If you would like a free sample of David's complete "Brinker related newsletter" and his "Retirement Advisor" newsletter, then click this link to send an email request and please tell us a bit about yourself too.



Monday, April 15, 2013

Proposal to Cap Retirement Accounts & 2013 Taxes

Moneytalk with Bob Brinker Commentary for April 14, 2013 Radio Show
The following commentary is from my "Retirement Advisor" writing partner,  David Korn

PROPOSAL TO CAP RETIREMENT CONTRIBUTIONS

Brinker Comment: Bob discussed an expected proposal from the White House on the budget that would limit individuals form accumulating more than $3 million in individual retirement accounts and other tax-preferred retirement accounts. The proposal would cap an individual’s total balance across tax-preferred accounts to an amount sufficient to finance an annuity of not more than $205,000 per year in retirement, equal to about $3 million this year.  Bob slammed the proposal and that it was totally outrageous and would never pass Congress and was pandering to politics.

Caller:  This caller has heard of situations where Mitt Romney a ton of money to his children by gifting severely undervalued stock that then increased dramatically in value.  The caller said if you drove the stock down to nothing and then gifted it to someone, then you move the company to China and the value of the stock starts to accelerate in value like crazy and do that a few times you could end up with $100 million in your retirement account. 


Bob said he doesn’t think the proposed policy to cap retirement accounts is aimed at that kind of thing which would be a rare thing if it did happen.  Bob said this looks like an anti-wealth accumulation policy measure and is consistent with the policy momentum that we have in Washington that wants to make it harder and harder for you to put money away.  There are politicians that are responsible for raising the kiddie tax liability age into adulthood.  This is really bad policy and the sooner we get past that thing the better.  On top of that, it doesn’t even raise any countable money toward the deficit. It is just lashing out at people’s efforts to accumulate a nest egg.

EC(David Korn)
: US News and World Report wrote a detailed article about it entitled, “Obama Budget Proposes Cap on Retirement Savings” that you can read for free at the following url: http://tinyurl.com/cupd3m6


Kirk Comment:  I stopped putting money into regular IRAs in 1998 when I started to work for myself and don't get a match from my employeer like I did when I worked for HP.  Instead I put the money into a ROTH IRA.  Unless you are paying at the very top tax rate in 2013, I think it makes much more sense to pay the taxes now when they are low, put the money into a ROTH and take it out tax free.  Money above the ROTH should go into index funds or individual stocks where you get lower capital gains or dividend rates (0 to 20%) compared to the much higher normal income tax rates you are charged with IRA RMDs (required minimum distributions.)

For more on tax rates, see:
Some of the above commentary is courtesy of my writing partner, David Korn
David Korn's Stock Market Commentary, Interpretation of Moneytalk (Bob Brinker Host), Financial Education, Helpful Links, Guest Editorials, and Special Alert E-Mail Service.  Copyright David Korn, L.L.C. 2013
If you would like a free sample of David's complete "Brinker related newsletter" and his "Retirement Advisor" newsletter, then click this link to send an email request and please tell us a bit about yourself too.

Monday, December 17, 2012

VWALX Vanguard High-Yield Tax-Exempt Bond Fund


Bob Brinker on VWALX, VANGUARD'S HIGH YIELD TAX-EXEMPT BOND FUND
Moneytalk with Bob Brinker Commentary for December 16, 2012 Radio Show
The following commentary is from my "Retirement Advisor" writing partner,  David Korn. 
Caller:  This caller owns the Vanguard High-Yield Tax-Exempt bond fund (VWALX) which has a net asset value of $11.37.  
Bob said the highest that fund has been at any point this year is $11.40 so it is within 1% of its high for the year.  
Caller:  What¹s your forecast on the fund?  
Bob said when you are dealing with high yield securities, you are dealing with a level of credit risk.  Bob said watch how investors react to the quality of the holdings in the fund.  If they get worried about the quality that can impact how much they are willing to pay for shares.  The other thing to watch is interest rates.  We haven¹t seen much movement in the interest rate arena since they came off their lows.
Kirk Comment: Hmmmm... I seemed to have missed the answer to this question.  I went back to the show archives and didn't hear Bob give an answer. 
EC (David Korn):    The Vanguard High-Yield Tax-Exempt bond fund (VWALX) is up 13.02% for the year ending 11/30/2012.  Read more about the fund at this url: http://tinyurl.com/ch34xwv
Kirk Comment: Note that this fund is known as a "junk bond fund" and it has risk similar to stocks during bear markets for equities.  I prefer to own stocks since the upside is better (unlimited) for stocks while the downside is very similar.  From Vanguard:
Vanguard High-Yield Tax-Exempt Fund Admiral Shares (VWALX)This low-cost municipal bond fund seeks to provide a high level of federally tax- exempt income and typically appeals to investors in higher tax brackets. The fund’s lower credit quality may provide a higher yield, but it makes the fund more susceptible to price volatility due to uncertain prospects for the bond issuers. Investors who are looking for a fund that may provide sustainable federal tax-exempt interest income and can tolerate moderate risk to principal may wish to consider this fund as a complement to an already diversified fixed income portfolio.
Kirk Comment:  Read: Best Retirement Portfolio For You 

Bob Brinker on Gold

Moneytalk with Bob Brinker Commentary for December 16, 2012 Radio Show
The following commentary is from my "Retirement Advisor" writing partner,  David Korn. 


Caller:  This retired fellow is age 77 and has cash sitting in Vanguard¹s Money Market account.  Should he invest 20-30% of his portfolio in gold and if so how should he buy it? 

Bob said Bob said the first question is whether you want to "speculate" in gold because when you buy gold it is like all precious metals ­ you are speculating what other people will pay for it in the future. If you are going to buy gold, Bob would limit it to a small percentage of your portfolio as a hedge ‹ meaning 5% or less of a portfolio and he would use the exchange traded fund GLD. Stay away from numismatic coins unless you are a certified coin dealer. Bob reiterated that he does NOT view gold as a long-term investment, merely a speculation.

EC (David Korn):    The SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) closed Friday at $164.13 and have traded in a 52-week range of $148.27 to $174.07.
 
Kirk Comment Bob Brinker has GLD listed as a "hold" on page 7 of his December 2012 Marketimer under "INDIVIDUAL ISSUES" as a HOLD at $166.05  He says in the newsletter "individual stocks are limited to no more than four percent of total equities in order to control specific stock risk."  Gold is not an "individual stock" but an ETF much like VTI, SPY and DIA that he also recommends under "INDIVIDUAL ISSUES."   Looking back:
  • Bob Brinker had GLD listed as a "hold" on page 7 of his December 2012 Marketimer under "INDIVIDUAL ISSUES" as a HOLD at $166.05.
  • Bob Brinker had GLD listed as a "hold" on page 7 of his December 2011 Marketimer under "INDIVIDUAL ISSUES" as a HOLD at $170.13.
  • Bob Brinker had GLD listed as a "hold" on page 7 of his December 2010 Marketimer under "INDIVIDUAL ISSUES" as a HOLD at $135.42.
  • April 2013 Update:  GLD is currently at $140.91.  Its most recent low was on April 15, 2013 at $131.31.
See 

Kirk Comment:  Read: Best Retirement Portfolio For You 
Don't Miss Out in BIG Gains!

Ask about getting your first Issue For Free!





Monday, March 22, 2010

Bob Brinker Health Care Legislation Thoughts

Below is David Korns "interpretation" of the March 20 & 21, 2010 Moneytalk (Bob Brinker Host) shows. You can read more about David Korn here.

************************************************
MARKET NUMBERS AS OF FRIDAY MARCH 19, 2010
Dow: 10,741.98
Nasdaq: 2,374.41
S&P 500: 1,159.90
10-Yr. Bond: 3.687%
************************************************

HEALTH CARE LEGISLATION

Brinker Comment: Bob addressed the health care legislation in Congress from a financial standpoint. Bob noted that the legislation will impose taxes on unearned income, including dividends, interest, capital gains, annuities, rents and royalties. This is a new tax of 3.8% above the income thresholds for high earners. When it becomes effective, this will drive the capital gains tax rate in places like California to over 34% for earners in the top bracket. This will occur because it is expected the federal capital gains tax rate will go up to 20% in January of next year, and then you add in the state taxes. Bob criticized the President for this tax policy included in the legislation. Bob said he cannot understand why you would penalize people through these taxes who are out there risking their money on investments.

DAVID KORN: The Medicare Payroll Tax on investment income would start in 2012 and would be expanded to include unearned income. That will be a 3.8% tax on investment income for families making more than $250,000 per year ($200,000 for individuals)

Brinker Comment: Bob noted that under the proposed legislation insurance companies will have to pay a hefty tax on high end insurance plans — the so called, “Cadillac” plans. There is even a 10% excise tax on indoor tanning services.

DAVID KORN: This tax isn’t supposed to go into effect until 2018, but would require insurance companies to pay a whopping 40% excise tax on high-end insurance plans worth over $27,500 for families ($10,200 for individuals). Dental and vision plans would be exempt and not counted in the total cost of a family’s plan.

Caller: This caller receives a structured monthly settlement payment and in two years will get a lump sum payout. Will the new taxes apply to that? Bob said those types of payments are normally tax-free and so the new healthcare taxes should not apply.

Brinker Comment: Bob said tax policy is changing rapidly. Starting in January, the new top federal bracket will be 39.6%. If you are a California resident, where many people live and work, the top bracket will be 50.1%. Add on the current two-sided Medicare tax and you are at 53% and when the tax goes up it will go to 54%. Consider that the current capital gains tax is 20% in January. For California residents, add on another 10.5%. That takes their capital gains tax rate to 30.5% in January. And then whenever they get to the effective date of the proposed Medicare unearned tax rate, you are at 34.3% capital gains tax! These numbers are staggering.

DAVID KORN: Here is a timeline of tax provisions in the house health care bill:

http://tinyurl.com/yjdlfqc

Brinker Comment: There has been a lot of talk about the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) projections on the health care legislation. Usually, there is positive talk about the CBO putting forth reasonable projections that are more reliable than what the partisan politicians will say. But Bob said he did some research on the CBO, and back in 1965 on the passage of Medicare under President Johnson, the CBO made a long-term projection that by 2010 the annual cost of Medicare would be $60 billion. How much did it really cost this year? It is not even close! The 2010 cost of Medicare will come in at $480 billion. That is 8 times greater than what the CBO projected. Bob asked rhetorically what kind of cost overruns will come up on this new entitlement program as 32 million people are being brought into healthcare under this proposal. Bob said he is guessing the cost overruns will be massive. If the CBO was off by a factor of 8 for Medicare, how much will they be off here? Bottom line, we are looking at incurring massive government debt over the long term with this legislation. And we don’t need that right now. We are already up around $12 trillion and they are talking about $20 trillion debt in the decade. All of this national debt has to be financed. We must borrow the money to pay the interest.
DAVID KORN: The CBO has predicted a $940 billion price tag for the new insurance coverage provisions in the bill and a reduction of the future federal deficits of $138 billion over 10 years. The New York Times has an article entitled, “Checking the Math on Health Care” at this url:

http://tinyurl.com/ydqsxx7

NEW JOBS BILL

Brinker Comment: President Obama just signed a new law which is an $18 billion jobs package that is called the “HIRE” Act. This is an incentive for business to hire unemployed individuals by providing a payroll tax forgiveness period with an added credit for each qualified retained worker. So if you hire a new unemployed individual, you get forgiveness of the 6.2% employer’s share of the employee’s payroll tax for the rest of 2010. Unlike Medicare, Social Security tax is capped on $106,800 of earnings for 2010. And you get the tax forgiveness up to that full amount.

DAVID KORN: This is part of the Hiring Incentives to Restore Employment Act which was signed into law on Thursday. To qualify for the benefits, employers must hire unemployed workers between February 3, 2010 to January 1, 2011. The reduced tax will have no impact on the employee’s future Social Security benefits. Additionally, for each unemployed worker retained at least a year, a business may claim an additional general business credit of up to $1,000 per worker when filing their 2011 income tax returns.

OTHER TAX ISSUES

Brinker Comment: Bob said it is reasonable to expect that as we head into summer Congress will be moving forward to address the expiration of the estate tax in 2010 and put one back in. Right now, nobody can make any plans because they don’t know what tax policy will be. Bob said he also expects Congress to address the soon-to expire marginal tax rate cuts and the marriage penalty. There is a sea change in tax policy afloat. But Bob pointed out one thing we know for sure; namely, every single freshman Democrat in Congress that voted in favor of the unpopular tax increase in 1993 was voted out of office in their next election. Looking at the results of Virginia, New Jersey and Massachusetts in recent months, Bob said he thinks we are going to see a number of political careers come to an end this November.

DAVID KORN: Read the article entitled, “Congress to Start Fixing Estate Tax” at this url: http://tinyurl.com/yhda6o4

FEDERAL RESERVE

Brinker Comment: The Federal Reserve Bank had its most profitable year in its 96-year history. The Federal Reserve provides funding for its own operations and in 2009 they made a $45 billion profit, all of it which gets turned over to the U.S. Treasury as income on the Treasury statement. The Treasury needs everything it can get these days. These numbers may not be big compared to companies like JP Morgan, but the truth is the Fed had an aggressive program in 2009. They were buying bonds and by the end of the year they owned $1.8 trillion in US government debt, up from $500 million the prior year. They earn interest on those securities and that was a major source of income in 2009 and largely responsible for their profits. They also made money when they made emergency loans to banks and other Wall Street companies.

Bob praised Ben Bernanke and the Fed for the job they did. Bob said most of the flack that gets thrown at the Federal Reserve is bogus. The critics want to abolish the Fed and turn over control of monetary policy to the federal government, which Bob said would be the worst possible idea.

DAVID KORN: The Federal Reserve’s Open Market Committee announced this week that it was maintaining the target rate for the fed funds rate at 0 to 25% and said conditions are likely to “warrant exceptionally low levels of the federal funds rate for an extended period.” Read the statement at this url: http://tinyurl.com/ycdbbwr

MUTUAL FUND SAFETY

Caller: Who monitors the big mutual fund companies like Vanguard, Fidelity, T.Rowe Price, etc. How can you ensure that you don’t have a situation like Bernie Madoff? Bob said these are entirely different situations. Bernie was essentially a one man show. His situation had nothing in common with the big mutual funds. There is no evidence that he was making any transactions with investor funds. When you have money in a mutual fund, you can get the accounting reports and transactions. There wasn’t that kind of transparency with Madoff.

DAVID KORN: To add insult to injury, there are look-alike web sites mimicking the Securities Investors Protection Corporation targeting Madoff victims! Some serious financial sharks out there. Speaking of protection against your investments, here is a link to the SIPC web site to learn how SIPC protects your accounts: http://www.sipc.org/

MONEYTALK GUESTS

On Saturday, Bob had William Cohan, author of “House of Cards: A Tale of Hubris and Wretched Excess on Wall Street.”

On Sunday, Bob had Mark Gilbert, author of the book, “Complicit: How Greed and Collusion Made the Credit Crisis Unstoppable (Bloomberg)


FINAL THOUGHTS FROM DAVID KORN: Have a great week! - David

Background: David Korn and I have been writing about Bob Brinker since the 1990s. I also write about other financial pundits such as Jim Cramer, Bill Flanagan, Sy Harding, Lynn Jimenez and Suze Orman.

It became clear to us that many of the popular TV, internet and radio pundits were too aggressive for those in or about to enter retirement. For example, Bob Brinker had is conservative "balanced model portfolio #3" at nearly two thirds equities when the market peaked and he told a caller on the radio it was not his advice to rebalance the portfolio back to 50% equities and 50% fixed income. David and I formed a partnership and at the start of 2007 we began offering The Retirement Advisor newsletter with our model portfolios that we felt subscribers could "sleep well at night with."

Contrary to Brinker's advice, we rebalanced our portfolios by selling equities and adding to fixed income after a good year for equities in 2007. Thus our losses at the end of 2008 were much less than Brinker's losses from the top so our subscribers could sleep better at night. Then at the start of 2009 we rebalanced again buying equities considerably lower then were we sold at the end of 2007.
As it turns out, our timing could not have been any better as all three portfolios are up over the past three years. Performance Data.

David Korn Links:
Don't miss out! Click here to start your subscription to The Retirement Advisor now!

-

Tuesday, January 05, 2010

Bob Brinker Outlook Moneytalk Summary

Below is David Korns "interpretation" of the January 2 and 3, 2010 Moneytalk (Bob Brinker Host) shows. You can read more about David Korn here.

Background: David Korn and I have been writing about Bob Brinker since the 1990s. I also write about other financial pundits such as Jim Cramer, Bill Flanagan, Sy Harding, Lynn Jimenez and Suze Orman.

It became clear to us that many of the popular TV, internet and radio pundits were too aggressive for those in or about to enter retirement. For example, Bob Brinker had is conservative "balanced model portfolio #3" at nearly two thirds equities when the market peaked and he told a caller on the radio it was not his advice to rebalance the portfolio back to 50% equities and 50% fixed income. David and I formed a partnership and at the start of 2007 we began offering The Retirement Advisor newsletter with our model portfolios that we felt subscribers could "sleep well at night with."

Contrary to Brinker's advice, we rebalanced our portfolios by selling equities and adding to fixed income after a good year for equities in 2007. Thus our losses at the end of 2008 were much less than Brinker's losses from the top so our subscribers could sleep better at night. Then at the start of 2009 we rebalanced again buying equities considerably lower then were we sold at the end of 2007.
As it turns out, our timing could not have been any better as all three portfolios are up over the past three years. Performance Data.

David Korn's Moneytalk Interpretation

Time to check in with Bob Brinker’s Moneytalk radio show along with editorial comments and web site links that hopefully will benefit you. Bob hosted Saturday, but on Sunday KGO Business Reporter Lynn Jimenez was guest host. I covered all of Saturday’s show below.

TACTICAL ASSET ALLOCATION WATCH (based on Friday’s close)

Editorial Comment ("EC"): Here is how the major market indexes have performed (excluding dividends) since Bob Brinker's timing model turned "favorable" based on the S&P 500 Index's close on March 10, 2003, and he recommended investors redeploy their cash reserves into a fully invested position by bulletin issued at 2:00 a.m. on March 11, 2003:

S&P 500 Index: Up 40.31%
Dow Jones Industrial Average: Up 39.84%
Nasdaq Composite: Up 80.57%

********************************************************************

STOCK MARKET IN 2009

Brinker Comment: The markets put in substantial gains in 2009. The S&P 500 put in a total return of 26.5% including dividends. Historically, that is a big number. The Total Stock Market Index put in a total return of 28.7%. The S&P 500 closed 1015.1 and the Dow closed at 10,428. The Dow had a lagging performance in 2009. But the Dow is peculiar and is not a market capitalization index and only has 30 stocks and can be a misleading barometer of what is going on.

EC: I noted earlier how the S&P 500 has had a negative decade. The Dow has done even worse. When you consider inflation-adjusted returns, the Dow would have to rise another 28% from these levels just to get to the 1999 level. The Wall Street Journal published an article entitled, “Adjusted for Inflation, Dow’s Gains Are Puny” which you can read at this url:

http://tinyurl.com/y99m683

Brinker Comment: Over the course of the show, Bob plugged his investment letter and referred listeners to the returns on his web site at http://www.bobbrinker.com/portfolio.asp.

EC: Bob’s Model Portfolios I and II which are 100% stocks outperformed the market in 2009 and he has posted those returns as well as 5, 10, 15 & 20 year returns. This is a departure from last year when he did not publish his annual returns.

Kirk Comment: Note Brinker does not give his returns by year where you would learn he is still down significantly since the 2007 peak. Brinker shows his returns when they are good and doesn't disclose the years they are poor. I wish he was more like me where I disclose my returns by year here and here. Brinker has a newsletter called "Marketimer" which implies he can time the stock market. Disclosing data that shows he was advising 100% in equities at the very top in 2007 with a "gift horse buy" in the mid 1400s and "bashing recession Cassandras" like me (ECRI Calls it "A Recession of Choice") would not be good for his "market timing" business.

FIXED INCOME

Brinker Comment: On the fixed income side, we are still seeing low rates because the Federal Reserve is sticking with its policy of maintaining low interest rates to help the economy. Three-month Treasury Bill is paying just 6 basis points annually. Just one-sixteenth of one percent. The six-month Treasury Bill is paying 19 basis points annually. The one-year Treasury is yielding 44 basis points. The two-year Treasury Note is yielding 1.14%. The Five-year Note is yielding 2.70%. The 10-year Note is yielding 3.83%. The 30-year Bond is yielding 4.63%
EC: Rates in all categories have all gone up a bit in the last few weeks. The Economic Cycle Research Institute’s weekly gauge of future U.S. Economic growth said its Weekly Leading Index rose to a 77-week high of 131.2 for the week ended December 25th. According to Lakshman Achuthan, managing director of ECRI, the recent growth in this leading index “points to continuing improvement in economic activity and the jobs market in coming months.” Read more at this URL:

http://tinyurl.com/yk4wc69

INFLATION EXPECTATIONS

Brinker Comment: In order to get a handle on inflation, Bob said he compares the Treasury Inflation Protected Securities versus regular Treasuries. Currently, the 10-year Treasury Note is yielding about 3.83% and the 10-year Treasury Inflation Protected Security is yielding 1.40% which gets us an annual implied inflation rate of 2.4% over the next ten years. The current CPI is 1.8% and so these are getting close. We went through a period of deflation where there was a much bigger gap. But now that gap is closing. Looking at a longer time frame, the 20-year TIPS (longest maturity out there) is yielding 2.0% versus the 30-year Treasury Bond which is yielding 4.6% which prices in annual implied inflation rate of 2.6% over the next couple of decades.

Caller: A caller told Bob he was fully expecting higher inflation and interest rates and wanted to position his portfolio of Certificates of Deposit accordingly. Bob said if you are expecting that to happen, best thing to do is to create a ladder of CDs so that you can reinvest the proceeds as maturities occur.

EC: Check out this article entitled, “FED FOCUS — The coming Great Inflation, real or imagined” at this url:

http://tinyurl.com/yl2dsaf

HIGH CREDIT CARD DEBT

Caller: This 60-year old caller has a credit card with a $19,000 balance with a 9% interest rate. Should she cash in her 401(k), pay the taxes and pay off the credit card debt? The caller said she and her husband made $75,000. Bob said she would be paying 25% for the top marginal bracket, so 25 cents on the dollar plus her state income tax might mean that 30% of what she takes out is paid in taxes. And you would also be blowing up your retirement account. Bob said he didn’t like the idea and suggested she try to come up with other ways to pay off the credit card balance. Tighten up your budget, get another job, cut up the credit card, etc. Paying 9% is an extremely high rate to pay on credit, especially when you consider how low interest rates are right now.

EC: The Federal Trade Commission has a good resource entitled, “Knee Deep in Debt” at this url:

http://tinyurl.com/a64dfw

GOVERNMENT BONDS

Brinker Comment: The Municipal Bond Market and the fixed income market have both had good years. Ten-year AAA Municipal Bond General Obligations are currently yielding 3.25%. If you adjust that for a 35% top federal tax bracket, that would equate to a 5% taxable equivalent. The 30-year AAA Municipal Bond security is yielding 4.47% and that equates 6-7/8ths% for the top bracket.

EC: Tax-exempt bonds are expected to return more than Treasuries for the second straight year. The average extra yield investors are demanding to buy tax-exempt bonds rated BBB instead of AAA is 270 points, compared to 50 basis points in June 2007 before the financial meltdown. Still, that is much lower than in January 2009 when the spread was 440 basis points. Check out the article entitled, “Tax-Free Shortage May Repeat Muni debt Outperforming Treasuries.”

TAXES

Brinker Comment: In 2010, the top federal tax bracket will stay at 35%, however, don’t expect that to last. Under current law, the top brackets will go up in 2011. The 35% bracket will go up to at least 39.6% in 2011. Whether it goes higher remains to be seen. Several tax increase proposals are being proposed in Washington. In the Senate version of the healthcare bill, they came up with the idea to increase the uncapped Medicare payroll tax which will go from 2.9% to 4.7% if you are self-employed.

Bob said there is no doubt that taxes are on the rise and we are headed for a period of higher income taxes in our country. The House version of the Bill is proposing a surtax on high earners of about 5.4%. If you live in a state like California, the top state income tax bracket is close to 10.5%. Add on to that the federal tax bracket that is most likely going to 39.6% at a minimum in January 2011, along with the new proposals and you could be looking at close to 60% taxation living in California! Bob cautioned listeners that there is a general tax tsunami heading toward the people in the United States. There are proposals for taxes on stock transactions, a war tax, and the list is only getting bigger. The reason for this is because the out-of-control spending is forcing the hand of politicians to raise revenue.

EC: I haven’t seen much written yet about the implications of higher taxes beginning in 2011 on the stock market but I am going to do some research on it. Presumably, individuals will make decisions toward the end of the year as people position themselves to try and be hurt as least as possible by higher taxes.

I-BONDS

Caller: This caller bas bought some I-Bonds at different times and noticed that some of them paid nice yields, but there were some that paid virtually nothing. How can that be? Bob noted that there was a period of time between for six months that ended October 31st where the interest was zero because we hade deflation. That ended on November 1st. The I-Bonds are earning an annual rate of interest of 3.36% for the six month period ending April 30th. And on top of that you would add the base rate which would depend on when you purchased it.

EC: The Bureau of the Public Debt today announced November 2, 2009 an earnings rate of 3.36% for Series I Savings Bonds, and a fixed rate of 1.20 % for Series EE bonds, issued from November 2009 through April 2010. Earnings rates for I bonds and fixed rates for EE bonds are set each May 1 and November 1. Interest accrues monthly and compounds semiannually. Bonds held less than five years are subject to a three-month interest penalty. Both series have an interest-bearing life of 30 years; the EE bond fixed rate applies to a bond’s 20-year original maturity.

WHETHER TO CONTINUE TO CONTRIBUTE TO 401(K).

Caller: This caller is 2-years away from retirement and about 12 years away from needing to withdraw money. He has been advised to stop funding the 401(k) for the next couple of years because of the big tax liability he could face when he starts withdrawing. Bob said the problem with that recommendation is you are going to increase your tax liability today if you stop contributing to the 401(k) and you don’t get the opportunity to grow the money in the 401(k) tax deferred over the next 12 years. Also, many people when they withdraw are in a lower tax bracket so that is something to consider as well. Bob said if it were him he would continue to make regular contributions into the 401(k) account because of that great advantage of reducing the upfront tax liability. And since you have that money you did not pay up front to Uncle Sam, you can use it to invest.

EC: The IRS recently announced that the cost-of-living adjustments for pension plans and other retirement plans for tax year 2010 will remain unchanged. This means that the contribution limits for 401(k) plans in 2010 will remain at $16,500 and for individuals over the age of 50, their catch-up contribution will remain unchanged at $5,500. That means you could put $22,000 or a $423 weekly contribution. Your company match, if any, is not counted toward these limits.

IRA CONTRIBUTION

Brinker Comment: For 2010, if you are under age 50, you can put up to $5,000 in a traditional IRA account and if over age 50 you can put in another $1,000. Same applies to the Roth IRA. There are income requirements that apply to how much you are able to put in, but if you are eligible these are good accounts. Bob said he likes the Roth IRA very very much if you are eligible. Everyone is eligible for the traditional IRA. You can fund the 2009 IRA up until April 15, 2010.

EC: Consult the Infernal Revenue Service’s web page on 2010 Traditional and Roth IRA Contribution Limits at this url:

http://tinyurl.com/4wtorb

ROTH IRA CONVERSION

Caller: This caller is in a high tax bracket and has been funding a self-directed IRA. He has the opportunity to convert to the Roth IRA but he would have to pay taxes. Bob said he is not a big fan of converting to a Roth when you are in a high tax bracket. Bob said he has an IRA and he has not converted. Bob said he would rather have the money working for you. If you were in a zero or really low bracket that might be a different story.

EC: Check out this article entitled, “Roth IRA conversion not worth the taxes”:

http://tinyurl.com/y92oghl

MORE GOVERNMENT BAILING

Caller: This caller wanted Bob’s opinion on the additional funding by the government to Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac and GMAC. Bob said there is a big difference between the two. The $3.5 billion additional pledge to GMAC is a relatively small development to the trillions on the line. The unlimited Fed backstop to Fannie and Freddie, however, is going to be a lot of money. Bob said the government has been on a campaign over the last decade encouraging people to buy their own house and this is where it has taken us. The government is trying to provide liquidity and stability to the mortgage market through their backing of Fannie Mae and Freddy Mac. But it is taxpayer money make no mistake.

EC: Here is a link to the Treasury Announcement on the Restructuring of Commitment to GMAC:

http://tinyurl.com/yf3maz5

EC: Here is a link to the Treasury Update on the Status of Support for Housing Programs:

http://tinyurl.com/yc3q655

THE BIGGEST CHALLENGE FACING THE FED

Caller: Can we trust the Fed will eventually be able to tighten and pull back stimulus when the time comes? Bob said this will be one of the biggest challenges Ben Bernanke will face in 2010 and forward — getting the excess liquidity out of the system while not hurting it. It is a huge challenge. A lot of that excess liquidity is not doing anything for the economy, it is just sitting on deposit at the Federal Reserve. It is not really developing anything in terms of the monetary multiplier. It is just idle money sitting at the Fed. But eventually this will have to be resolved with an orderly withdrawal.

EC: In a speech last month to the Economic Club, Ben Bernanke framed his remarks as answers to frequently asked questions at this url:

http://tinyurl.com/yeund9x

EC#2: And just yesterday, hot off the presses, Bernanke gave a speech entitled, “Monetary Policy and the Housing Bubble” which makes for good reading if you want to ran out of Tylenol PM. Check it out at this url:

http://tinyurl.com/y9w9cqy

HEALTH SAVINGS ACCOUNT

Caller: This caller asked Bob his opinion on Health Savings Accounts. Bob said he likes them and if you are in a position to do it you should. In fact, you can still fund your 2009 tax amount. For single coverage, you can put up to $3,000 of $5,950 for a family. If you are over age 55, you can put in another $1,000. You can do that up until April 15, 2010. Bob said you can set up an Health Savings Account through your financial institution. This is a terrific way to put some money away, take advantage of the tax privileges and have the ability to pay medical expenses.

EC: A Health Savings Account is an alternative to traditional health insurance; it is a savings product that offers a different way for consumers to pay for their health care. HSAs enable you to pay for current health expenses and save for future qualified medical and retiree health expenses on a tax-free basis. You must be covered by a High Deductible Health Plan (HDHP) to be able to take advantage of HSAs. An HDHP generally costs less than what traditional health care coverage costs, so the money that you save on insurance can therefore be put into the Health Savings Account. Also, you own and you control the money in your HSA. Decisions on how to spend the money are made by you without relying on a third party or a health insurer. You will also decide what types of investments to make with the money in the account in order to make it grow. Consumers can sign up for HSAs with banks, credit unions, insurance companies and other approved companies. Your employer may also set up a plan for employees as well. An HSA is not something you purchase; it’s a savings account into which you can deposit money on a tax-preferred basis. The only product you purchase with an HSA is a High Deductible Health Plan, an inexpensive plan that will cover you should your medical expenses exceed the funds you have in your HSA. However, HSA trustees often will charge fees for their services. To learn more, go to this url:

http://tinyurl.com/y3vujk

MONEYTALK GUESTS

On Saturday, Bob had on Joseph F. Hurley, author of “The Best Way To Save for College --- a Complete Guide to 529 Plans”


As noted earlier, Bob did not host Sunday's show and the substitute host, Lynn Jimenez, isn't worth summarizing.

David Korn Links:
Don't miss out! Click here to start your subscription to The Retirement Advisor now!

The Retirement Advisor Portfolios

Dollar Value on 12/31/09

Change

Model Portfolio 1

$214,500

7.2%

Model Portfolio 2

$224,106

12.1%

Model Portfolio 3

$237,109

18.6%

DJIA 12,501.52 on 1/1/2007

$10,428

(16.6%)

S&P500 1,418.30 on 1/1/2007

$1,115.10

(21.4%)


The Retirement Advisor Model Portfolios all began with $200,000 on 1/1/2007

Click here to start your subscription to The Retirement Advisor now!

As noted earlier, Bob did not host Sunday's show and the substitute host, Lynn Jimenez, isn't worth summarizing.

FREE Updates Mailing List


We email regular "FREE Bob Brinker Fan Club Updates" to everyone on our "Bob Brinker Fan Club" distribution list. If you would like to get on this list, then click this link.


Top Rated Newsletter


Timer Digest Features
Kirk Lindstrom's Investment Letter
on its Cover

Cick to read the full page article!






US Treasury Rates at a Glance - iBond Rates - LIBOR Rates

Must Read:
Beware of Annuities - Payday Loans Warning